products   company   all

Wireless Watcher

Shhh: NSC Puts the Brakes on Chit-Chat

By Jennifer Hooker, IEN Staff

January 16, 2009—We’ve all seen it and most of us are probably guilty of it…multitasking on the road. Whether it’s chatting on the cell phone, fiddling with the radio, sipping on coffee, or applying that final coat of mascara, we just can’t help ourselves. For lots of people, the time behind the wheel is the only bit of free time in the day. However, the National Safety Council (NSC) is trying to drive home the idea, that time in the car isn’t the time to catch up on calls—it’s a time to concentrate on driving.

The NSC is pushing businesses, governors, and legislators to enact and enforce laws prohibiting a driver from using a cell phone. The organization cities a study from the Harvard Center of Risk Analysis, which estimates that cell phone use while driving contributes to six percent of accidents. This equates to roughly 636,000 crashes, 330,000 injuries, and 2,600 deaths per year. The study also estimated that the cost of these accidents tops out at $43 billion. In these rough economic times, that could be reason enough to hang up the phone.

In the past, the NSC has been successful in demanding stronger laws on seatbelt use and drunk driving, and now it is focusing some of its energy against phone use. “Studies show that driving while talking on a cell phone is extremely dangerous and puts drivers at a four time greater risk of a crash,” said Janet Froetscher, president and CEO of the NSC. “Driving drunk is also dangerous and against the law. When our friends have been drinking we take the car keys away. It’s time to take the cell phone away.”

PC World reports that no state has banned phone use while driving completely, but 23 states have passed restrictions. For instance, the District of Columbia along with 23 states have banned teens from chatting behind the wheel. However, only six states include drivers of all ages and they all allow chatting with the use of hands-free devices. The NSC sees the use of hands-free devices as a placebo effect. “When you’re on a call, even if both hands are on the wheel, your head is in the call, and not on your driving,” Froetscher said. She went on to explain that a conversation with a passenger isn’t as districting because passengers provide “another pair of eyes on the road.” The person at the other end of the line has no idea of the conditions on the road while they are blabbering on about the latest episode of American Idol.

Considering all of the other distracting activities that drivers engage in instead of focusing on the road, why is the NSC going after cell phones? Using a cell phone while driving is much more pervasive, making it more of a potential driving risk.

According to CNN, the CTIA wireless association is hoping to educate drivers against distracted driving rather than pass laws against cell phone use. “ Laws aimed just at wireless use create a false sense of security with regard to the issue of the distracted driving,” the agency said in a posting on its website. The CTIA’s vice president of public affairs, John Walls, also stated that the association believes for a brief period of time, cell phones can be used responsibly and safely behind the wheel.

Resisting the temptation to use cell phones and other forms of tech in the car is going to get even tougher with many vehicles offering and planning to offer entertaining gadgets in dashboards. Ford along with many other automakers rolled out their plans to integrate a fully functional dashboard computer…complete with a printer at CES. Looks like the NSC will have a long road ahead of them with this one… 

Add a Comment

 
 

Comments

  • Ramone on Jan 26 2009 1:41:57:000PM

    Whats next on the NSC's (paranoiac) agenda? A ban on all walkie-talkies and on cellphone use while walking on the streets also?! Pretty soon, we'll have come back full circle to where we were before cellphones happened. Way to go...go back to low-tech days!!

  • M.George on Jan 22 2009 11:10:02:000AM

    Greg C, the pilot, makes a good observation that pilots must multitask because flying the plane requires that. Staying alive on a motorcycle requires another skills set of being attentive as well as having a real grasp of how to respond to certain circumstances as they present themselves. The point I am trying to make is that it is really up to the driver of an automobile to take responsibility to stay in command. It could well be that interacting with the radio is more than someone can handle and still perform at an operating level high enough not to be a danger to oneself or others! For those individuals when/if the cell phone isn't the issue then something else will be.

  • Zlosk on Jan 20 2009 6:09:32:000PM

    I don't have a GPS. If I get lost, I call my destination or a friend with a computer and have them talk me through until I'm back on track. IMO, listening to directions while driving is much better than trying to read them. Then again, I prefer to keep my eyes on the road...

  • doug on Jan 19 2009 7:16:01:000PM

    Well.....just an hour ago...while driving here in Sacramento, California... (a no-hand-held cell-phone state), a woman was on my left...then turned right directly in front of me...going to a fast-food place....talking on the phone...3 kids in the car....My point? The law doesn't work....

  • Greg C on Jan 19 2009 3:21:34:000PM

    I'm not too sure that adding yet another law will solve the issue of 'distraction'. As many of you have noted, it's not just the cell phone that adds distraction, it's food, make up, shaving, talking, playing with the car controls, etc. As a pilot, I know too well the art of 'multi-tasking'. We learn to fly, observe air traffic, monitor instruments, talk, listen, and read, what seems like simultaneous operations. You can be sure that Captain Sullenberger was using multiple skills while landing that jet. More education and stricter driving skills tests (with recurrency tests) might go a long way to improving our driving population and reducing our accident rate.

  • Chris on Jan 19 2009 2:31:52:000PM

    What about the driver who is always looking at his GPS for driving directions? I think that they (GPS's) are just as much or more of a hazard than cell phones.

  • Jon on Jan 19 2009 2:12:27:000PM

    Ditto to Steve, The capability of some drivers to drive competently, let-alone-multi-task, is woefully inadequate. We have migrated to a entitlment attitude where license granture is concerned. I'm personally extremely biased against Volvo drivers who think that they have the right to hog the road and carry on discussions with their passengers, at the expense of even staying in their own lane, let alone being aware of the traffic about them. We have advanced the capability of the performance of our cars without demanding that the performance of those driving them be advanced right along with them. The answer is to make it harder to get a license, not the impossible task of regulating the attention span of the populace that already is behind the wheel.

  • jim on Jan 19 2009 1:53:59:000PM

    automobile accidents are the number 0ne cause of death for teenagers and young adults. Adding a cell phone to the mix increases the risk. Parents are concerned about second hand smoke affecting their kids health but they buy them cell phones and give them the keys to their car.sorta hypocritical huh ?

  • Ron on Jan 19 2009 1:42:30:000PM

    So why don't they make the car safer. They could make cars talk to each other, keep people from driving too fast, alert us when we are in danger,and keep us from running into the back of people. We got too many other things to do not to multitask. The problem is driving is just too boring most of the time, especially going the sooo slow speed limits. I think I would fall asleep if I did not multi task.

  • Steve on Jan 19 2009 1:36:19:000PM

    Education, education, education!.....There are no limits to the things of distraction in a vehicle, and there are plenty of people driving that have no business driving; let alone having the capability to multi-task behind the wheel or at any other time! Where would you stop in these bans, all in the 'name of protection'. Maybe we should just pass laws to weed these certain drivers out....just kidding, but I hope you get my point!

  • james on Jan 19 2009 1:28:46:000PM

    I recently ran a stop sign while talking on the phone. The lady who hit me was also.

  • L Herrington on Jan 19 2009 1:21:34:000PM

    Is it going to be illegal to report an emergency or a drunk driver? What about accidents? What about when stopped in traffic and not moving? What about reporting a crime? Am I going to be committing a crime by trying to save lives?

  • Dave on Jan 19 2009 1:18:11:000PM

    Hope they are sucessful. Drivers on cell phones are a MAJOR hazard on the roads.

  • mark on Jan 19 2009 1:05:26:000PM

    The ban will never happen! Companies and the public expect 24-7 availability and service from everyone. I never wanted a cell phone but, my employer gave me one and expects me to answer anytime they call. I wish them good luck in trying...

view allRelated Blogs